The Incredible Lament
The latest big screen version of The Incredible Hulk brought back some of the pathos I liked from the 1970s series, the unrequited love, relentless pursuits, forgetfulness, and lurking despair. The Brazilian favelas held such promise for updating what made me nostalgic as did Banner's waking up in Guatemala and wandering into Chiapis. Some compare the 70s show to "The Fugitive," but it harkens back at least to Hugo's Les Miserable. It also has shades of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, of course.
Despite it's promising start, the movie quickly veered into developing a whacky, improbably one-sided foe supposedly worthy of the Hulk. By the time the Hulk faced him, I'd lost all interest in the movie. This disappointing script saw Banner hope to channel the Hulk, while docilely abetting the military skunk-works that created his problems and the monster he faced. Bleh! It missed the point as far as I'm concerned. So much for the Hulk's anger being an unwitting fighter for justice.
Why do American action movies need a supposedly kickass bad guy? Why can't the Hulk's condition be enough of a conflict? The thing I liked about the show was that the Hulk's anger always manage to save his normal-seeming host no matter dire the situation. These episodes were always in quiet conflicts in back alleys involving poor people struggling to survive somehow.
The teaser for a sequel at the end of the latest attempt sets up yet another Hulk vs. arbitrary "worthy" foe scenario. I hope the sequel, if there is one, will use a script with more integrity and show more conflicts that arise from Banner's wandering. For instance, a sequel could show more of the conflicts between rich and poor and make more of the theme of impossible love. These are timely and timeless themes. Weapons dropped on cities from on high are not something I want to see in a movie like this, no matter how sympathetic the weapon.
