Use License

Google Search Here Goes


June 15, 2008

The Incredible Lament

The latest big screen version of The Incredible Hulk brought back some of the pathos I liked from the 1970s series, the unrequited love, relentless pursuits, forgetfulness, and lurking despair. The Brazilian favelas held such promise for updating what made me nostalgic as did Banner's waking up in Guatemala and wandering into Chiapis. Some compare the 70s show to "The Fugitive," but it harkens back at least to Hugo's Les Miserable. It also has shades of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, of course.

Despite it's promising start, the movie quickly veered into developing a whacky, improbably one-sided foe supposedly worthy of the Hulk. By the time the Hulk faced him, I'd lost all interest in the movie. This disappointing script saw Banner hope to channel the Hulk, while docilely abetting the military skunk-works that created his problems and the monster he faced.  Bleh!  It missed the point as far as I'm concerned. So much for the Hulk's anger being an unwitting fighter for justice.

Why do American action movies need a supposedly kickass bad guy? Why can't the Hulk's condition be enough of a conflict? The thing I liked about the show was that the Hulk's anger always manage to save his normal-seeming host no matter dire the situation. These episodes were always in quiet conflicts in back alleys involving poor people struggling to survive somehow. 

The teaser for a sequel at the end of the latest attempt sets up yet another Hulk vs. arbitrary "worthy" foe scenario. I hope the sequel, if there is one, will use a script with more integrity and show more conflicts that arise from Banner's wandering. For instance, a sequel could show more of the conflicts between rich and poor and make more of the theme of impossible love. These are timely and timeless themes.  Weapons dropped on cities from on high are not something I want to see in a movie like this, no matter how sympathetic the weapon.

April 30, 2007

Channeling Matthew McConaughey

W and I just yesterday saw the movie "Fracture."  Even though I enjoyed it, but I wasn't hugely impressed for reasons I'll explain if you ask me.  We tried out a brand new theater, had some hassles parking, buying our tickets and finding our way around.

One distracting thing for me was that, throughout the entire movie, I thought Ryan Gosling, the new male up-and-comer reminded me of someone. The Southern drawl he took up for the movie, particularly, triggered other memories, as did his blue eyes, his body language.  I could not place a name on the other face that kept coming up when I thought of RG. By the time crossed the street and hiked to our car, I narrowed my idea down to the previous actor's face to the same generation of young male actors as when Patrick Swayze was popular, that is, the early 1990s. W probably thought I was obsessing a bit too much on the actors, so I told him I'd probably think of the actor's name by the next day.

Today, a day later, I endured another day of the mystery guy's face floating in front of my imagination where Ryan Gosling's had floated before. To exorcise that ghost, I finally went to IMDB and started clicking links on '80s and '90s movies: guy flicks, buddy movies, Western-themed movies, anything like that. (Westerns were more rare than sound savings and loan businesses back in those days and worthwhile sub-prime loans are these days.)

Finally, I looked up Chris Cooper, a man who revels in his accents. I clearly recall him doing Western accents back in the 90s. Bingo! The man whose name I could not recall really did star with CC in "Lone Star."

Matthew McConaughey =  Ryan Gosling (at least in my mind, after it took in "Fracture" and started associating.)  MM has been getting steady work since the 80s, too.  I'm a bit worried I could not think of his name.

I don't know to what extent MM in "Lone Star" served as an inspiration for RG in "Fracture," but I would opine that it was A LOT!

February 11, 2007

Is Miranda Priestly right: is size 6 the new 14?

Miranda Priestly (Devil #1 in The Devil Wears Prada) is sort of right.  Size 6 is really the old 14 (or 12, anyway).

I've been thinking about sizes lately, since mine has been creeping upward and hunts through my closet have been getting increasingly uncomfortable lately.  It seemed to me, when I ordered a party dress online recently, that sizes are now a lot more ample than they used to be?  How to check something like this out?  I don't actually trust web searches on this one, so I turned to my library.

First, I consulted a high school textbook published in 1955 called Clothing Construction and Wardrobe Planning.  That book had no size charts at all (presumably because the readers were so good at clothing alterations that size charts were unnecceary). It did include an entire chapter of advice on buying "readymades," including instructions on how to be polite to the store sales clerks.

I then consulted Readers Digest Complete Guide to Sewing that included a size chart from 1976.  The "misses'" chart started with size 6 and went to size 20.  The "women's" chart started at size 38 and went up to size 50.

When I compared it with the "general women's size chart" from my favorite online clothing vendor, I noticed that all the waist sizes starting with size 6 were 4 inches larger than they were in the 1970s!  The new chart also had sizes 0, 2, and 4 to cover those people who have not expanded in the past 30 years.

Hence the faith-based sizing I've heard about lately. That's why size 6 jeans from my teenage years are only have only 23-inch waist and why size 6 jeans in the stores now have a 27-inch waist.

October 31, 2006

I am so going to love this

When I heard that Sacha Baron Cohen had a movie coming out, namely Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan, I knew immediately I 1) was in love with something very funny and 2) will have to go see it opening weeking.

Why?  I noticed Sacha Baron Cohen as the best voice actor in the lame animated movie, Madagascar.  He played Julien, king of the meerkats. He also sang one of the best movie songs I've heard in a long time. I meant to blog about him not realizing he's famous in the UK for his characters Ali G, Borat, and Bruno.  It's almost enough to get me to subscribe to HBO for the Ali G marathon.

Anyway, I expect Borat will be so bitingly funny and over-the-top as to provide us beleaguered Americans and Brits a much needed release of laughter.  Even the title says fun.  We technical writers encounter prose like that much more than not.  I will relish enduring it in the interest of entertainment and cathartic release!

In other news, I am influenced by advertising infrequently (or so I think). The new motto for the Nintendo DS is "Do Something With Your Nothing."  If I only had more Nothing to Do Something with, I would buy a DS and the game, Brain Age.

I think there is something to the idea that I can keep my mind in shape by exercising it. Back when I was studying for the GRE, I ran through the multiplication tables up to 20 x 20 in my head while exercising.  When I started out, I was frighteningly slow at remembering even the 10 x 10 combinations.  Over time, I got faster and more confident.  Then, I won't even mention chess, which would be something also exercise-like to do in my Nothing. At any rate, watching Borat probably won't help me keep mentally agile, but I'll watching it anyway.

If I do see and experience these things, I will let you know (including any decrease in my "brain age").

March 29, 2006

Well, well, well, what does Netflix mean?

Netflix skews ratings.  I'm not sure what their system is for presenting their customers with movie ratings, but they seem to skew the opinions based on how a person rates other movies. I first noticed this after I read this book:

T. C. Boyle: The Road to Wellville

T. C. Boyle: The Road to Wellville

I saw the movie in theaters when it first came out about ten years ago. I have come to enjoy T.C. Boyle's work and wanted to compare the book with the movie.

When I looked on Netflix for the movie ratings, I saw on my page for Road to Wellville this text, right next to the little rating graph showed a 3.3 star rating out of 5 stars:

"Average of people who rate like you: 3.3 stars." 
"Average of 333,300 ratings: 2.9 stars."

Who are these people "who rate people like me"?  Are we the few who liked the (very funny) movie better than most of the 333,300 other people? I'm both puzzled and irritated by Netflix's rather condescending tone. What does it mean? "Like me"? At the time I looked this up, I'd rated about 550 movies. How can you really now someone from their rating of 550 movies?

Frustrated, I wandered around Rotten Tomatoes for a while to see what the profession critics thought of the movie, Road to Wellville. Roger Ebert revealed a lot about himself, his history, his upbringing in rating the movie, speculating that he liked it because he is a "true believer" and that only others like him would enjoy the satire.  I was startled reading this!  What is it about this movie?  I'm nothing like Roger Ebert -- I don't wander willingly around the health food ailses -- and I liked the satire.

The story, briefly, is about the antics of people in Battle Creek Michigan during the early 1900s. A young couple struggles to regain health and love at a sanatorium. This is made more difficult by the glitch that the despot (a member of the Kellogg family) who runs the sanatorium forbids sex, claiming it is unhealthy.  A young man comes to town, and after a few hard blows, tries to remake his lost fortune by duplicating the success of Kellogg corn flakes.  Through in a recalcitrant adopted son, a gaggle of interesting san' inmates and you've got yourself a comedic motherload.

As for my reaction to the book, I only just liked it.  The movie was so well cast and lingered so lovingly on the sexual awakenings of the female characters, that I actually enjoyed the movie a bit more. For example, the book tread lightly on the German sex therapist, hinting even less at what the "special massage" entailed than the movie did. The book did not mention at all erotic joys of riding a bicycle.  Otherwise, the plot and character development were remarkably similar.

Casting was great, except that Kristin Davis would have been perfect in the role of the true-believing wife instead of the adequate Bridget Fonda. 

After I read the book, I realized that my cousin gave me a German translation to book.  Anyone want it?  I would think it would translate very well, culturally and everything.

June 05, 2005

Letters of consolation (and weddings)

Just this very day, I returned home from experiencing two weddings in as many weeks. One wedding was local and the part I experienced was not, in fact, the wedding. The other required international travel from the West Coast almost all the way across the entire North American continent to Niagara, Canada. As careful or long-time readers of this blog will know, material to read in flight is always a concern of mine.  I like it to be engaging, but not too deep.  This trip I decided (rather perversely, I admit, given all the nuptial bliss I've been privy to the last few weeks) to read the story of Heloise and Abelard.  As shotgun weddings and marital woes go, their story takes first place outside the Greek tragedy category. 

Briefly, Abelard, the brilliant philosopher of the twelfth century, taught his best, young student, Heloise, not only classic literature and the finer points of Latin and logic, but also the best sexual positions. After Heloise got pregnant and the couple was married in secret, the bride's angry uncle castrated Abelard. In response, the two lived celibate lives apart. Heloise became a nun, then an abbess just as Abelard became a monk then an abbot. 

Fifteen years after these romantic traumas, Abelard wrote a "letter of consolation" to another monk. The idea of a letter of consolation is to tell a suffering person a tale of woe so vividly and sympathetically that the reader will feel better about their own situation in comparison. It did not take me many seconds of reflection to realize that "stories of consolation" tend to be my favorites.  The music of Leonard Cohen, for instance, awakens these feelings in me (along the lines of "I'm so glad I'm not a man"). While these sort stories, songs, and artworks do not always make the top of the best-sellers list, there is a brisk market.  I would put both Tarnation and Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events in this category (the former arguably more sincere than the latter).

I, like many people, have my own tale of woe and could perhaps author a letter of consolation as a purgative like a cat coughs up a hairball. A rather humorous version could be the tale of my weddings experiences of the past couple of weeks. 

The Indian event to which I was invited was not actually a wedding. It was a ceremony hosted by the groom and groom's family the day before the wedding. The Hindu priest blesses and interacts with the groom's parents and the groom out of earshot of the many, many people who attend.  To prevent boredom, the family hands out food and drink to everyone (rose ice cream and water) and gifts to the VIPs and supplies an emcee or wedding singer.

The event, which starts at 9 a.m. for the family perhaps as the invitation stated, really starts closer to 10:30 a.m. for the audience. I arrived too early.  It took me an hour to figure out the the men sit on one side of the auditorium and the women sit on the other (I sat for a while on the men's side).  After I moved, I gazed around the large hall, entranced by the clothes. These were not the everyday saris I see Indian women wear on the street sometimes in my city. The women there that day were dressed in stunningly beautiful silk saris.  Most were studded with sequins and crystals and they sparkled against the bright silks. Those saris not beaded with sequins were embroidered with gold and silver thread. The men in the groom's family wore very flattering ivory silk tunics and, even in the midst of all the pre-wedding confusion, managed to looked handsome if they were young or dignified if they were not so young.

I finally found the person responsible for inviting me and I went to him to let him know I had arrived (in my non-silk, Western attire). He sat me all by myself in the empty women's part of the VIP section. The VIP section seated about 200 to 300 people in white chairs.  The other 1,000 people sat in red chairs.

Shortly before the family appeared on stage for the ceremony, the male VIPs entered en masse.  Still I sat alone and self-conscious in my gender-specific VIP section.  Right before the ceremony, the women of the groom's family came in and surrounded me on all sides. By chance, the groom's aunts sat next to me. My patron asked that they explain the ceremony (actually, even they didn't know the details, either). I had brought a money gift ($20 plus $1 to grow on as is the custom), but I had no idea what to do with it.

Still we waited. We were not meant to hear any of the proceedings on stage between the priest and the family. (I had met the priest during an earlier visit, so I recognized him and his role in the event.) To keep us occupied, the family had hired a truly bizarre wedding singer. He seemed before the wedding like a reasonably intelligent person, if maybe a but blonder than usual for Indians and certainly more unctious. His English was frustrating to endure.  He slowed his words down to about one eight normal speed, so it pained us all to listen to him. When he spoke his Indian language, he sounded (to my untrained ear) to talk more normally. The aunts and I amused ourselves by mocking him. A lot. Even the bride and her three attandantes came on stage with a great deal of irritating serenading from the wedding singer. (I understood fromt the aunts that this is somewhat unusual.)

Midway through the ceremony, the wedding singer announced that the groom's family were honored by the presence of several community VIPs in attendance. He enumerated us in order of: one U.S. Senators, me, and a county supervisor.  The senator came late, so there was no room for her and her husband to sit in the VIP section.  The organizers found her and her husband a spot in the front row of the men's section.  I pointed her out to the aunts, who attended her when it was their turn to pass out gifts.

And did we VIPs ever get gifts!  We got three separate packs of food. I got a package with two anklets and a sari of my own, as did all the women in the VIP section.

After the ceremony, I waited in line with the aunts to give the groom my gift. Part of the procedure was to place a bit of ocher paste on the groom's forehead and add a grain of rice or two to the mix.  I abode by this custom, much to the surprise and amusement of the groom's father.

Rather than waiting with the masses of guest who were eating in tents outside for lunch, I found my patron who escorted me to the front of line in the VIP room just off the great hall.  (Also a trick I learned during a previous visit). In this hall, I met more dignitaries, more commissioners, county supervisors, candidates for state assembly and the like (non-Indian like myself) as well as many leaders in the Indian community (no women except us non-Indian dignitaries, of course). 

Food at Indian weddings is extra rich. I enjoyed the lentils, for instance, which were made with triple the usual amount of oil. Once I ate, I found the my friend and host (the groom's father) to say "thank you" and "farewell." The groom's father explained that his own fabric factories in India had made the saris he provided his female guests. He introduced me to the manager of the factory, his friend who had flown to the U.S. just for the wedding. The groom's father called all his family and friends around to meet me, called the photographer over to have his picture taken with me, gave me his card, and asked his closest friends to also give me their cards.

I left just after I handed out my last card. I felt curried, so to speak, and more comfortable with the Hindu temple scene than I had when I first arrived.  My main tale of woe, I suppose, is not having any sparkly sari to wear, no rich tone to my skin set off by bright silks, and of course, the moments of discomfort by myself sitting in a sea of VIP seats.

For my most recent wedding experience, beside having to travel for a day there and a day back, I saw it from the point of view of a wedding photographer, a sleep-deprived one at that.  The hotel food and unfortunate location of my room kept me up all one night. (Notes to self: farm-raised quail should not taste gamy and has probably gone bad if it does and if you have a room near the pool, move.)  I ate and drank too much. 

However, I also received many gifts and party favors from this wedding, including extra batteries for my camera, a 1 GM 40x memory card I could keep, a picture frame, Jordan almonds and jaw breakers wrapped in tulle and placed in an acrylic swan.  What is my most prized possession from my journey to Niagara?  Beside the memories, the samplings of ice wine, the sight of Niagara falls lit up at night, and the one or two wedding photos I took in my official capacity that transcend the ordinary? -- probably the swan.

April 06, 2005

Cringing at the movies

The book that I fell in love with at the silent women's retreat turned out to be one of those books best savored in small sections. I tried to breeze through it on my trip back home, but I found my brain freezing up.  I'll savor it and write about it soon.

In the meantime, I'll catch up on logging my reactions to other books I've read recently, especially popular novels turned into movies.

It has to be an appealing idea to have your book turned into a movie. Maybe.  If the casting is right and the plot stays intact. Sometimes -- most of the time -- the movies never quite capture the mood and flavor and depth of the book.  There are exceptions where the movie is much better than the book (I'll try to think of them), but I usually prefer the book to the movie.  I have a list of books (or plays) I read first, then saw the movie.  Othello is one book coming up on my list.  The Quiet American is another.

The book, Snow Falling on Cedars, by David Guterson falls squarely in this category.  I say already that I like the book better without having seen the movie.

How do I know?

The novel is set in the Pacific Northwest on a remote island. A fisherman is found dead. The local Japanese kendo expert stands trial for his murder.  The book weaves flashbacks around a courtroom drama. Frankly, I found the book enjoyable, but immanently forgettable. I seem to recall that some viewpoints were told in present tense, but most were in past tense.

With a deft, muted touch, the book deals with racism, intolerance, the prevailing grace of truth.  This is not to say "deaf mute," but maybe I like a bit more articulation to my characters, like the loquacious procurator in The Brothers Karamazov. Maybe I like a bit more interaction, a bit more direct conflict.

That's what all I say intellectually. However, my reaction to the original Japanese movie, Shall We Dance, may belie the impact the novel had on me.  In short, I felt very strongly that the Japanese actor, Kôji Yakusho, would have been perfect in the role of the accused man, Kabuo Miyamoto. I felt this so strongly that I was horrified to find that a very young person played Kabuo.  It just felt wrong to give the role to such  a youngster.

Kabuo, a man living with traditional Japanese values in America, met his plight with restraint and dignity -- just the sort of emotions that would seem like lack of remorse to an American jury.  These sections of the book felt a bit pedantic, but clearly they stayed with me. A young man could not have the tragic air the role required, the air that Guderson so clearly described in such lengthy detail.

I wonder what Guderson felt about the movie version of his book.  Were I he, I would be disappointed (probably).  Maybe I should rent the movie, just to cringe on his behalf.

Nevermind. I have many Kôji Yakusho movies to watch.  Like Kamikaze Taxi and The Eel.

Never will I watch Yakusho in Memiors of a Geisha! Bah! Kôji Yakusho was cast as Nobu in the movie version. He's not the Chairman?  Bah!  I hope they put him in a fat suit and add lots of facial scarring!  Will cringing on behalf of Arthur Golden be in order?

And whatever happened to the movie version of Empire Falls so I can cringe for Richard Russo, too.

February 09, 2005

77th Academy Award Preparation Status

I started this habit a couple years ago, trying to watch as many Academy Award nominated movies as possible between the announcement and the big day.  Work and other commitments always seem especially heavy during my pre-Oscar push to see the movies nominated in the major categories and I often catch myself berating myself for spending my time in such a "frivolous" manner.  However, later each year, I feel richer for having done it.  I understand media commentators better.  I have a greater sense of cultural changes and how current events affect what entertainment we watch.

So, now the cycle starts again, with the time pressures compounded (as usual). Again, as last year, here is my status of movies yet to be watched:

Remaining to be seen (in theaters)
  The Chorus
  Polar Express
  A Very Long Engagement
  A Series of Unfortunate Events
  Finding Neverland
  Hotel Rwanda
  Being Julia
  Phantom of the Opera

  Sea Inside
  The Incredibles


Video will be out in time
  Village
  Ray
  Shark Tale


Gone from theaters/Not out on DVD in time
  As It Is in Heaven
  Downfall
  Yesterday

Sadly, after tomorrow, Unfortunate Events and The Chorus will be gone and I will not have seen them. Still, The Sea Inside came back from theatrical oblivion, so perhaps the Chorus will come out on DVD one day.

Liyla 4-Ever never did.

October 11, 2004

21 Grams vs. Dirty Pretty Things

If you read my blog in late February or early March, you know that I try to watch all the movies that have been nominated for Oscars. This was even more impossible to do this year because there were only three of four weeks between the time the nominees were announced and the time that the awards are presented. To keep my Netflix queue humming, I catch up with those I missed throughout the year.

I just finished watching two of the nominees from 2003. 21 Grams got nominations for best actress and best actor. Dirty Pretty Things was nominated for best screenplay.

My reactions to these movies were completely opposite. Where 21 Grams farted around, chaotically half-assedly introducing the characters in the first 20 minutes, Dirty, Pretty Things got to the heart of the matter within the first 10 minutes. (Heh, heh, that is, the protagonist finds a heart in a toilet in the hotel where he works only 5 minutes into the movie.) I watched the first 15 minutes of 21 Grams one day, came back a few days later, watched 5 more minutes, read the synopsis which listed everyone who had issues, meaning who would be involved in the accident, who would die, who would be at fault and who would be affected. I'm not saying there were no twists and surprises in 21 Grams, but I found myself detached from all the characters. Sean Penn as a math professor! Please! No credibility for that whatsoever for me. The characters in 21 Grams were all locked in remorse for the past.

Dirty, Pretty Things, on the other hand, reeled me right in. It fed on hope and on the future. The charming Audrey Tautou played a major role as a virgin Turkish immigrant to England. She played harsh/soft landlady to the also very charming Chiwetel Ejiofor, who beat his Chinese friend at chess in the pre-heart-finding minutes. The Chinese friend did something I always look for in movies, and which I will start documenting on my blog. He recommended a book to the main character. Moviemakers mean to be didactic whenever they put books titles in movies, so I always make a point to note which books are mentioned. Unlike X2 - X-Men United in which the characters discuss the book, The Once and Future King, by name -- twice --, I had to pause Dirty, Pretty Things to read the title and author off the screen, The Greek Myths by Robert Graves. What followed was a tale of reversals, betrayal and organ poaching of tragic Greek proportions. After much tension, the resolution was satisfying (but not too satisfying) and, to cap it off near the very end, the Ejiofor character returns the book to his friend.

My clock got a lot of action during 21 Grams. The pacing was slow, the drama was mostly internal to the characters, so we had a lot of close-ups of people sitting around looking sad, traumatized or conflicted. Naomi Watts was better in it than Sean Penn, but still I kept waiting for the chapters to pass by faster.

Any summary I could make is that the movies that have good screen plays resonate better with me than those with merely good acting. I won't make that conclusion, because the appeal of a movie depends on many things and I'm sure I could think of some poorly written and directed movies that shine in places because of the actors.

August 04, 2004

For a quick read, try manga

When I asked my hubby if he was interested in watching the Ring, The (2002) with me during of my rare viewings of something in a horror genre, he said "No, I'd rather watch the Japanese original." (Ringu, 1998)

"What?" I said. At that point I found out that "The Ring" was a Japanese manga (graphic novel/comic book) before it was a movie. Later I found out that it was actually first a Japanese novel. How could I watch such a movie without first reading it in closer to it's original form? So one night I read the manga -- my first ever manga.

Misao Inagaki: Ring (Ring (Dark Horse))

The next morning I read the sequel.

Hiroshi Takashi: Ring (Ring (Dark Horse))

The first manga was well done. The story was tight and interesting. The pacing and tension building were well done and the black and white graphics of the manga lent itself well to the creepiness of the story.

The best part about manga is that it was a very fast read. In fact, I read the manga faster than it would have taken to watch the movie. There was no need to wait for people to drive around, to take time to actually say words, to let the creepy music set the mood. Nope, just "bam! bam! bam!" the action is all right there to soak up.

I doubt I'll turn into a manga fan, but I was pleasantly surprised by my first manga. Of course, the movie wasn't nearly as tense or interesting for me because I knew the ending. Still, it was fun because I wondered as I watched it how they would handle some of the Japanese characters who played important roles in the plot in ways American audiences would never accept (like the "superhumans" roster, the doctor who killed someone on request) and how they would handle various dead bodies that show up now and then. Both the movie and the manga were fun.

The second manga was a disappointment. The action was not clear, the scenes were muddled. If the American sequel to the first Ring follows the manga storyline, I'll skip it.

The DVD had a preview of the original Japanese movie. It looks well-done, but I doubt if I'll watch it, given my low tolerance for reruns.